What Agencie Is Pinky In

UK Medical Research (TBaiget EPI)

You who dedicate bibliometric analysis to make to order, maybe that interests you pry it was just released:

Bibliometric analysis of Highly cited publications of health research in

England, 2002-2006

Thed van Leeuwen, Jonathan Grant and Siobhán Ní

Chonaill

WR-829-DH

February 2011 Prepared for the Department of Health

http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2011/RAND_WR829.pdf

is a classic medical specialties ranked by research centers in the United Kingdom conducted by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Netherlands, to the National Institute of Health in the UK.

appointments have counted only the WoS.

Protein In Black Pudding

altmetrics11: Tracking Scholarly Impact on the Social Web (TBaiget EPI)

altmetrics11: Tracking Scholarly Impact on the Social Web

Koblenz (Germany), 14-15 June 2011 An

ACM 2011 Web Science Conference

Workshop Keynote: Mike Thelwall, University of Wolverhampton, "Evaluating online Evidence of research impact"

 

The increasing quantity and velocity of scientific output is presenting scholars with a deluge of data. There is growing concern that scholarly output may be swamping traditional mechanisms for both pre-publication filtering (e.g peer review) and post-publication impact filtering (e.g. the Journal Impact Factor).

 

Increasing scholarly use of Web2.0 tools like CiteULike, Mendeley, Twitter, and blog-style article commenting presents an opportunity to create new filters. Metrics based on a diverse set of social sources could yield broader, richer, and more timely assessments of current and potential scholarly impact. Realizing this, many authors have begun to call for investigation of these "altmetrics." (see http://www.altmetrics.org for a bibliography and more details).

 

Despite the growing speculation and early exploratory investigation into the value of altmetrics, however, there remains little concrete, objective research into the properties of these metrics: their validity, their potential value and flaws, and their relationship to established measures. Nor has there been any large umbrella to bring these multiple perspectives together. The altmetrics 11 workshop aims to encourage both these.

 

* New metrics based on social media

* Tracking science communication on the Web

* Relation between traditional metrics and altmetrics

* Peer-review and altmetrics

* Tools for gathering, analyzing, disseminating altmetrics

 

Location

 

The workshop is hosted by the ACM Web Science Conference 2011 (Koblenz, Germany). This interdisciplinary conference focuses on advances in studying the full range of social-technical relationships on the Web. Please visit the Web Science site for more information.

 

Organizers

 

* Paul Groth – VU University Amsterdam, NL

* Jason Priem – University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

* Dario Taraborelli – Wikimedia Foundation, USA

The Organizers Have an interdisciplinary background Covering Sociology, Information and Library Science and Computer Science.

Nose Cancer Just Inside Nose

Change Local - Week CRECS - Barcelona, \u200b\u200bMay 3, 2011 (TBaiget)

Because it is higher than the originally planned number of entries (now going by the 150) we had to change of location. The presentation of the Yearbook ThinkEPI 2011 and the celebration of the CRECS Day will take place in the new auditorium of the School of Communication Blanquerna , the Ramon Llull University , close to previous local Cidob .

Library - Auditorium

Blanquerna

C / Valldonzella, 12. 08001 Barcelona

http://maps.google.es/maps?hl=en-GB&q=valldonzella+12+Barcelona

On behalf of the EPI team, thank you very much for coming to celebrate our 20 th birthday.

-

Conference on quality social science journals

(CRECS 2011)

Barcelona, \u200b\u200bMay 3, 2011

PROGRAM

8:30 - 9:00 Registration, coffee and pastries

9:00 to 9:30 Miquel Tresserras , Dean of the Faculty of Communication and Tomàs Baiget , EPI. Welcome.

FRAMEWORK FOR THE SPANISH JOURNAL OF SS AND EVALUATION CC

9:30 to 10:00 Christopher Urban, UB. "Quality Criteria and classifications"

10:00 to 10:30 Luis Rodríguez-Yunta, CCHS-CSIC. "Magazines like image of disciplines and scientific fields, are there too many publications of Sciences Social in Spain? "

DETAILED ANALYSIS OF INDICATORS APPLIED TO MAGAZINES SS DC

10:30 to 11:00 Emilio Delgado López-Cózar , UGR. "The journal impact: a coveted object of desire and cloudy."

11:00 to 11:30 Café

Felix From 11:30 to 12:00 -Moya, CCHS-CSIC. "International visibility of the English publications of Social Sciences

12:00 to 12:30 Txema Baez, Asincubo and Cristina González- Copeiro , Fecyt. "Project I3C, index Iberoamerican Research and Knowledge. First evaluation process, 2010. "

12:30 to 13:00 Pere Masip Masip-, URL. "English Journal of communication: a brief history of a mirage."

13:00 to 13:30 Enrique Orduña-Malea , UPV. ThinkEPI 2011 Yearbook Presentation . "Type of contributions published ThinkEPI"

13:30 to 15:00 Eating tapas and canapés

DOING IN A JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

Isidro F. 15:00 to 15:30 Aguillo , CCHS-CSIC. "Let's see if we learn that we are in the XXI century."

15:30 to 16:00 Elea Giménez-Toledo , CCHS-CSIC Latindex. "What is a research article in CC SS. "

16:30 to 17:00 Lluís Codina, UPF. Proposal of good practice in assessing articles (peer review). "

17:00 to 17:30 Coffee

ROUNDTABLE

17:30-19: 30 Moderator: Javier Guallar , UOC, URL and UB. "Improving the situation Chila listing of the Social Sciences. " Intervene:

Ernest Abadal , UB LIS

Isidro F. NEEDLES , CCHS-CSIC, Cybermetrics

Lluís Anglada, CBUC, Open Access Journals

Isidoro Gil-Leiva , UM, Journal of Documentation

Granada Begoña , CSIC-CCHS, REDC (pend. confirm)

José López Yepes, UCM, Docum of Information Sciences

Fernando Ramos-Simon , UCM, Rev. Gen. Inf Doc

Jose Vicente Rodríguez-Muñoz , UM, Information Research

Carlos M . Tejada Artigas , UCM, EPI.

19:30 End of Day and CD-Ron (rum cocktail)

CRECS La Jornada 2011, held in collaboration with the Faculty of Communication Blanquerna

http://www.blanquerna.url .edu / web / default.aspx? idf = & id = & lang = _It

 --------- ------------------------------------------- INCYT Files:  http: / / listserv.rediris.es / archives / incyt.html -------------------------------------------------  ----- 
 
 
 
 

Mysore Mallige Sample Vedio

Papers for each $ 100,000 grant (CBAmat Ingenio-UPV)

My colleagues have just published something for the English case, although

limited to the area of \u200b\u200bFood Science and Technology. Evaluating research efficiency
Within National R & D Programmes in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.005
Moreover, I find this invaluable contribution of the group of Luis
Zanz: Overturning Some Assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems
on publication performance in

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0312-7

How To Trade Pokemon On Mac Vba

Papers for each $ 100,000 grant (TBaiget EPI)

The Canadian Heather Piwowar has searched for studies on the number of papers and articles published by the amount of the financing of projects and has been found to vary between 0.5 and 5 papers per 100,000 U.S. $.

http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/papers-per-dollar/

Apparently, no major differences between disciplines.

I think that in less affluent countries have higher productivity, right? Tomàs

Baiget

Http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com

Wa State Drivers License Template

number of authors in the original research ( CBenito WIT-UPV))

The number of authors of scientific and technical journals increased steadily. Institutions, funding agencies and public policies promote collaborative research, but the multiple authorship raises distrust or rejection. The valuation of a personal scientific background would be more reliable if there were baseline data. We analyzed the number of authors of the original English biomedical research to obtain reference values.

We downloaded the WOS 169,740 from biomedical research with English participation published between 1990 and 2009. In each case we calculated the number of authors per paper and the proportion of single-author work. The resulting figures have been related to the number of English and foreign institutions for work. The results are expressed in the context of the disciplines and areas of biomedical research.

The average number of authors has increased by 57.56% from 4.51 in 1990 to 7.11 in 2009. The increase is greatest in the areas of infectious disease (66.07%) Neuroscience (61.29%) and Biomedicine (69.53%). The proportion of original author only dropped from 3.59 to 2.08% in the period. A significant correlation between the number of institutions and the corresponding number of authors (Spearman 0.53 p \u0026lt;0.01). This relationship is strengthened when establishing institutional cooperation with international centers. The number of authors is almost always greater than that obtained in other estimates.

The number of authors of the English biomedical research is inflated. Although both this figure and the proportion of teamwork following the general trend continued in recent years, compared with other estimates reveals that the authors of English original biomedical research are always more numerous. Discipline and level of collaboration, especially with international centers are associated with a greater number of authors per paper.

You can access the data tables and read the manuscript accepted by Clinical Medicine http://www.ingenio.upv.es/?pag=autbiomed&lang=esp

Usb Sound Blaster Sb0480

Scimago Blog Launch Lab (BGonzalez SCIMAGO)

\u0026lt; abstract>
Announcement of Launch of Blog Lab Scimago
http://www.scimagolab.com/blog
List Topics: accredited college, university rankings and other research institutions, indicators of scientific quality, scientific impact, maps of science, information visualization techniques, fronts research, sociology of science, scientific knowledge and innovation i + D + I, Triple Helix, scientific visibility, journal metrics , visualization of scientific, design of information systems, etc.
\u0026lt;/ abstract>

------------------------------------------ ----------
INCYT Files: http://listserv.rediris.es/archives/incyt.html
--------------------------- ---------------------------

I write these lines to announce that Scimago Lab - Scimago Journal & Country Rank ( http://www.scimagojr.com ) and Institutions Scimago Rankings ( http://www.scimagoir.com ) - have just launched a blog from now on we will express our views and thoughts against current topics related to our main areas of work: Science Policy, Research Evaluation, Information Visualization, and Usability and Experience User.

The blog is available at http://www.scimagolab.com/blog/

Using an informed and informative, the blog will aim to connect with the interests of science topics that have traditionally shown the media communication and public opinion. Our idea is to turn the blog into an interface that any interesting results concecte bibliometric research, scientometric, or / and information visualization techniques to Public Opinion and Mass Media.

The following is a partial list of items to populate the blog posts: accredited college, university rankings and other research institutions, indicators of scientific quality, scientific impact, maps of science, techniques of information visualization, research fronts, sociology of science, scientific knowledge and innovation i + D + I, Triple Helix, scientific visibility, journal metrics, visualization of scientific, design of information systems, etc.

The first entry was made by Professor Félix de Moya Anegón, it discusses some relevant aspects of the use of normalized impact as a tool to evaluate research performance of universities and other research institutions.

In order to reach as wide an audience as possible we are forced to use English as the language of the blog, our intention is to make a space for debate and interaction with users Scimago product. So we invite you to participate with comments, or if you want you can also increase the degree of involvement by sending an email with any ideas, suggestions or comments to the address listed at the end of this note.

How Do You Fill Out A W4married Claiming Zero

III Seminar on Assessment EC3 science and science communication - Granada, 16-17 March 2011 (ACabezas EC3)

EC3 III Seminar on evaluation of science and science communication

http://seminarioec3.wordpress.com/

EC3

The workshop is a biennial gathering that aims to show the latest trends in research on Bibliometrics and evaluation of science, while to present the group's most recent work EC3.

In this third edition, to be held in Granada on 16 and 17 March, we have three distinct themes: rankings of universities, cybermetric indicators and methodology, and evaluation in Social and Human Sciences. The special guests this year is Mike Thelwall, a of the leading researchers worldwide in the social sciences. Next to him, experts like Aguillo Isidro, José Luis Ortega, Elea Giménez-Toledo, David Minguillo, Ferrán Mateo, Francisco Herrera and several members of EC3 participate in different round tables.

Registration, as always, is free, and also, in addition to the scientific program, we have prepared a lively social agenda that you may know the charms of Granada and fraternize with the speakers at the seminar.

have any information on the seminar http://seminarioec3.wordpress.com/

See you in Granada!

About EC3

The research group EC3 - Evaluation of Science and Science Communication at the University of Granada has spent several years providing documentary tools contribute to improving the visibility and English science. Development of impact indicators in social and legal sciences, develop software to evaluate institutions and researchers, we monitor the technological environment, and advise the English scientific journals to help them increase their quality.

WEB: http://ec3.ugr.es/

BLOG: http://ec3noticias.blogspot.com/

FB: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?filter=lf # / pages/EC3-Evaluacion-de-la-Ciencia-y-de-la-Comunicacion-Cientifica/149959235018284

TW : http://twitter.com/ # search /% 23ec3

- Álvaro Cabezas

Pontoon Console Wiring

Conference on quality social science journals (CRECS 2011) Barcelona, \u200b\u200bMay 3, 2011 (TBaiget)

Conference on quality social science journals

(CRECS 2011)

Barcelona, \u200b\u200bTuesday 3 May 2011

PROGRAM

8:30 to 9:00 Registration, coffee and pastries

9:00 to 9:30 Anna Borrull Cidob and Tomàs Baiget , EPI. Welcome.

9:30 to 10:00 Felix De-Moya, CCHS-CSIC. "International visibility of English publications Social Science

10:00 to 10:30 Txema Baez, Asincubo, and Cristina González-Copeiro , Fecyt. "Project I3C, index Iberoamerican Research and Knowledge. First evaluation process, 2010. "

10:30 to 11:00 Christopher Urban, UB. "Quality Criteria and classifications"

11:00 to 11:30 Café

11:30 to 12:00 Emilio Delgado López-Cózar , UGR. "The journal impact: a coveted object of desire and cloudy."

12:00 to 12:30 Luis Rodríguez-Yunta, CCHS-CSIC. "Magazines like image of disciplines and scientific fields, are there too many social science publications in Spain? "

12:30 to 13:00

Pere Masip Masip-, URL. "English Journal of communication: a brief history of a mirage."

13:00 to 13:30 Enrique Orduña-Malea , UPV. ThinkEPI 2011 Yearbook Presentation .

13:30 to 15:00 Eating tapas and canapés

Isidro F. 15:00 to 15:30 Aguillo , CCHS-CSIC. "Let's see if we learn that we are in the XXI century."

15:30 to 16:00 Elea Giménez-Toledo , CCHS-CSIC Latindex. "What is a research article in CC SS."

16:30 to 17:00 Lluís Codina , UPF. Proposal of good practice in assessing articles (peer review). "

17:00 to 17:30 Coffee

17:30 to 19:00 Roundtable moderated by Javier Guallar , UOC and UB. "Improving the situation of the English journals of social sciences." Speakers:

Ernest Abadal , UB, BiD

Isidro F . Aguillo , CCHS-CSIC, Cybermetrics

Louis Anglada , CBUC, Open Access Journals (RACO)

Isidoro Gil-Leiva , UM Documentation Annals

Fernando Ramos Simón , UCM, Rev. Gen. Información y Documentación

-José Vicente Rodríguez-Muñoz , UM, Information Research

Carlos M. Tejada Artigas- , UCM, EPI.

19:00 to 19:30 General Discussion

19:30 (approx.) End of Day and cd-ron (cocktail rum)

REGISTRATION

Admission is free but room capacity is 100 people. Registration required at:

http://www.thinkepi.net

PLACE

C entered International Information and Documentation in Barcelona

c / Elisabets, 12. 08001 Barcelona.

http://www.cidob.org

CONSULTATIONS

epi@elprofesionaldelainformacion.com

Regards,

Tomàs Baiget

http://elprofesionaldelainformacion.com